| |
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Tacuarembó. Por información adicional contacte bibliotb@tb.inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
|
Fecha : |
02/10/2015 |
|
Actualizado : |
12/10/2020 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Trabajos en Congresos/Conferencias |
|
Autor : |
FREY, G.E; PACHAS, A.N; NOELLEMEYER, E.; BALMELLI, G.; FASSOLA, H.E.; COLCOMBET, L; STEVENSON, H.D.; HAMILTON, J; HUBBARD, W; CUBBAGE, F.W. |
|
Afiliación : |
GUSTAVO DANIEL BALMELLI HERNANDEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Resumen y comparación de los sistemas silvopastoriles en seis regiones del mundo. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2009 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
En: Congreso Nacional de Sistemas Silvopastoriles, 1., 2009, Posadas, Misiones, Argentina Actas. Buenos Aires (Argentina): INTA, 2009. |
|
Páginas : |
p. 435-446 |
|
Idioma : |
Español |
|
Contenido : |
A pesar de que los sistemas silvopastoriles representan una clase única de sistemas productivos que combinan árboles, forraje y ganado, no son homogéneos en ningún sentido. Los productores integran ganado con plantaciones forestales y bosques nativos en diversas maneras y propósitos. En algunas regiones, la cultura y la tradición determinan que los productores enfoquen su manejo principalmente hacia el ganado y forraje o bien en los árboles, mientras que en otras regiones el enfoque está orientado hacia la producción conjunta. Se presenta una breve descripción y comparación de los sistemas silvopastoriles en seis regiones de cinco países del mundo: Misiones y Corrientes, Argentina, La Pampa, Argentina, el sureste de los Estados Unidos, la Isla Norte de Nueva Zelanda, Paraguay y Uruguay. Luego, se califican los sistemas silvopastoriles en términos del nivel de adopción, nivel de investigación, si reducen los costos o aumentan las rentas y si existe el manejo para la producción conjunta de todos los componentes. Se observó que existen semejanzas y diferencias entre los SSP de las regiones evaluadas. |
|
Palabras claves : |
ADOPTION; RESEARCH; SOUTH AMERICA. |
|
Thesagro : |
ARGENTINA; ESTADOS DEL SUDESTE (EUA); NUEVA ZELANDA; PARAGUAY; SISTEMAS SILVOPASCICOLAS; URUGUAY. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
K10 Producción forestal |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02105nam a2200337 a 4500
001 1053472
005 2020-10-12
008 2009 bl uuuu u01u1 u #d
100 1 $aFREY, G.E
245 $aResumen y comparación de los sistemas silvopastoriles en seis regiones del mundo.
260 $aEn: Congreso Nacional de Sistemas Silvopastoriles, 1., 2009, Posadas, Misiones, Argentina Actas. Buenos Aires (Argentina): INTA$c2009
300 $ap. 435-446
520 $aA pesar de que los sistemas silvopastoriles representan una clase única de sistemas productivos que combinan árboles, forraje y ganado, no son homogéneos en ningún sentido. Los productores integran ganado con plantaciones forestales y bosques nativos en diversas maneras y propósitos. En algunas regiones, la cultura y la tradición determinan que los productores enfoquen su manejo principalmente hacia el ganado y forraje o bien en los árboles, mientras que en otras regiones el enfoque está orientado hacia la producción conjunta. Se presenta una breve descripción y comparación de los sistemas silvopastoriles en seis regiones de cinco países del mundo: Misiones y Corrientes, Argentina, La Pampa, Argentina, el sureste de los Estados Unidos, la Isla Norte de Nueva Zelanda, Paraguay y Uruguay. Luego, se califican los sistemas silvopastoriles en términos del nivel de adopción, nivel de investigación, si reducen los costos o aumentan las rentas y si existe el manejo para la producción conjunta de todos los componentes. Se observó que existen semejanzas y diferencias entre los SSP de las regiones evaluadas.
650 $aARGENTINA
650 $aESTADOS DEL SUDESTE (EUA)
650 $aNUEVA ZELANDA
650 $aPARAGUAY
650 $aSISTEMAS SILVOPASCICOLAS
650 $aURUGUAY
653 $aADOPTION
653 $aRESEARCH
653 $aSOUTH AMERICA
700 1 $aPACHAS, A.N
700 1 $aNOELLEMEYER, E.
700 1 $aBALMELLI, G.
700 1 $aFASSOLA, H.E.
700 1 $aCOLCOMBET, L
700 1 $aSTEVENSON, H.D.
700 1 $aHAMILTON, J
700 1 $aHUBBARD, W
700 1 $aCUBBAGE, F.W.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
|
Fecha actual : |
12/10/2015 |
|
Actualizado : |
02/06/2017 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Abstracts/Resúmenes |
|
Autor : |
CAPURRO, M.C.; RICCETTO, S.; TARLERA, S.; IRISARRI, P.; FERNÁNDEZ, A.; CANTOU, G.; ROEL, A. |
|
Afiliación : |
MARIA CRISTINA CAPURRO BAZZANO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; SARA MAGDALENA RICCETTO AGUIRREZABALA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARIA GUILLERMINA CANTOU MAYOL, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ALVARO ROEL DELLAZOPPA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Irrigation management and greenhouse gas emissions in Uruguayan rice production systems: abstract. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2015 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Agrociencia Uruguay, v. 19, special issue "Inter-Regional CIGR Conference on Land and Water Challenges, 3., La Estanzuela, Colonia, UY. Tools for developing; "Dr. Mario García Petillo"", p. 60, 2015. |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
En versión electrónica difiere la paginación: Agrociencia Uruguay, v. 19, special issue, p. 64, 2015. |
|
Contenido : |
Environmental impact and sustainability of agricultural systems and management practices leading to climate change mitigation
are one of the most relevant issues to agricultural production nowadays. Mitigation is the process of reducing emissions or
enhancing sinks of greenhouse gases (GHG), to limit global warming potential and restrict future climate change. The most
relevant GHG are Carbon dioxide (CO2), Methane (CH4) and Nitrous Oxide (N2O). The steady increase of its concentrations
in the atmosphere over several decades has led to enhance global warming. CH4 and N2O are the most relevant GHG emitted
mainly in the agricultural sector. It is well known that water management has great impact on GHG emissions from rice paddy
fields. One of the most important tools for rice crop production and mitigation of CH4 emission is the controlled irrigation.
However, it could result in a N2O emission increase and reduced rice yields. For these reasons, it is remarkably important to
assess the tradeoff relationship between both GHG and the effect on rice productivity. A 3 year field experiment with two different
irrigation systems was set at southeast of Uruguay. Conventional water management (continuous flooding after 30 days of
emergence, CF30) and an alternative irrigation system (controlled deficit irrigation allowing wetting and drying, AWDI) were
compared. The objective was to study the effect of water management on GHG emission, water productivity and rice yields in
order to identify strategies for further progress in sustainable intensification of Uruguayan rice. Results showed that mean
cumulative CH4 emission values for AWDI were 55% lower than CF30 systems; on the other hand, there were no significant
differences in N2O emission among systems. Significant yield differences were not observed in two of the rice seasons, while
AWDI recorded a significant yield reduction in one of them. Total irrigation water applied and irrigation water productivity did not
showed differences in two of the rice seasons, while CF30 reported a higher amount of water applied and lower water
productivity in one of the seasons. It can be concluded that AWDI could be an option to enhance water productivity and GHG
emission mitigation. However, grain yield can be compromised in AWDI systems. The adoption of these technology is based
on the indispensable assess of an overall tradeoff between the risk of possible yield losses, total water used and GHG
emissions. MenosEnvironmental impact and sustainability of agricultural systems and management practices leading to climate change mitigation
are one of the most relevant issues to agricultural production nowadays. Mitigation is the process of reducing emissions or
enhancing sinks of greenhouse gases (GHG), to limit global warming potential and restrict future climate change. The most
relevant GHG are Carbon dioxide (CO2), Methane (CH4) and Nitrous Oxide (N2O). The steady increase of its concentrations
in the atmosphere over several decades has led to enhance global warming. CH4 and N2O are the most relevant GHG emitted
mainly in the agricultural sector. It is well known that water management has great impact on GHG emissions from rice paddy
fields. One of the most important tools for rice crop production and mitigation of CH4 emission is the controlled irrigation.
However, it could result in a N2O emission increase and reduced rice yields. For these reasons, it is remarkably important to
assess the tradeoff relationship between both GHG and the effect on rice productivity. A 3 year field experiment with two different
irrigation systems was set at southeast of Uruguay. Conventional water management (continuous flooding after 30 days of
emergence, CF30) and an alternative irrigation system (controlled deficit irrigation allowing wetting and drying, AWDI) were
compared. The objective was to study the effect of water management on GHG emission, water productivity and rice yields in
order to id... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
EMISIONES DE GASES DE EFECTO INVERNADERO; ÓXIDO NITROSO. |
|
Thesagro : |
ARROZ; MANEJO DEL AGUA; METANO; RIEGO; URUGUAY. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
F06 Riego |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/5056/1/Agrociencia-Congreso-CIGR2015-v.19.si.p.64-CAPURRO.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03479nam a2200277 a 4500
001 1053552
005 2017-06-02
008 2015 bl uuuu u01u1 u #d
100 1 $aCAPURRO, M.C.
245 $aIrrigation management and greenhouse gas emissions in Uruguayan rice production systems$babstract.
260 $aAgrociencia Uruguay, v. 19, special issue "Inter-Regional CIGR Conference on Land and Water Challenges, 3., La Estanzuela, Colonia, UY. Tools for developing; "Dr. Mario García Petillo"", p. 60$c2015
500 $aEn versión electrónica difiere la paginación: Agrociencia Uruguay, v. 19, special issue, p. 64, 2015.
520 $aEnvironmental impact and sustainability of agricultural systems and management practices leading to climate change mitigation are one of the most relevant issues to agricultural production nowadays. Mitigation is the process of reducing emissions or enhancing sinks of greenhouse gases (GHG), to limit global warming potential and restrict future climate change. The most relevant GHG are Carbon dioxide (CO2), Methane (CH4) and Nitrous Oxide (N2O). The steady increase of its concentrations in the atmosphere over several decades has led to enhance global warming. CH4 and N2O are the most relevant GHG emitted mainly in the agricultural sector. It is well known that water management has great impact on GHG emissions from rice paddy fields. One of the most important tools for rice crop production and mitigation of CH4 emission is the controlled irrigation. However, it could result in a N2O emission increase and reduced rice yields. For these reasons, it is remarkably important to assess the tradeoff relationship between both GHG and the effect on rice productivity. A 3 year field experiment with two different irrigation systems was set at southeast of Uruguay. Conventional water management (continuous flooding after 30 days of emergence, CF30) and an alternative irrigation system (controlled deficit irrigation allowing wetting and drying, AWDI) were compared. The objective was to study the effect of water management on GHG emission, water productivity and rice yields in order to identify strategies for further progress in sustainable intensification of Uruguayan rice. Results showed that mean cumulative CH4 emission values for AWDI were 55% lower than CF30 systems; on the other hand, there were no significant differences in N2O emission among systems. Significant yield differences were not observed in two of the rice seasons, while AWDI recorded a significant yield reduction in one of them. Total irrigation water applied and irrigation water productivity did not showed differences in two of the rice seasons, while CF30 reported a higher amount of water applied and lower water productivity in one of the seasons. It can be concluded that AWDI could be an option to enhance water productivity and GHG emission mitigation. However, grain yield can be compromised in AWDI systems. The adoption of these technology is based on the indispensable assess of an overall tradeoff between the risk of possible yield losses, total water used and GHG emissions.
650 $aARROZ
650 $aMANEJO DEL AGUA
650 $aMETANO
650 $aRIEGO
650 $aURUGUAY
653 $aEMISIONES DE GASES DE EFECTO INVERNADERO
653 $aÓXIDO NITROSO
700 1 $aRICCETTO, S.
700 1 $aTARLERA, S.
700 1 $aIRISARRI, P.
700 1 $aFERNÁNDEZ, A.
700 1 $aCANTOU, G.
700 1 $aROEL, A.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
